Friday, June 12, 2015

Is the Small Family Farmer On the Endangered Species List?

This morning as I was shaving and brushing my teeth, getting ready to leave for work, I heard the familiar sound of a crop duster flying overhead, undoubtedly broadcasting fertilizer on surrounding rice fields.  It is a noise that brings back lots of memories.  I can remember being in the fields early in the morning, holding a stake with a white rag stapled to the end of it to make a flag and waving it in the air. There would be another person at the end of the field doing the same.

Image Credit
The pilot of the crop duster would line up on us and as he would pass us and make a big loop in the air to turn around, we would count of the 18 or so steps forward and begin waving the white flag again. He'd line up on us and repeat the process until the field had been completely fertilized or sprayed. Just as when you are mowing and line your tire up on the edge of the previous pass of the lawnmower, the pilot needed the flaggers in order to ensure he wasn't overlapping or leaving gaps in the field.

Many young farm boys, like myself, 'cut their teeth' being flaggers on the edges of fields off of dusty dirt roads in outside water tower towns across America.  It was a simple job with little job skills other than being able to count to 20 and stand upright.  I met those qualifications at the time and fulfilled my job responsibility the best I could.

Image Credit
If you drive out in rural America, you'll see crop dusters doing their work as I described with one notable change.  There are no more flaggers.  The advent of GPS rendered the flaggers obsolete. Now the pilots rely on GPS coordinates to guide them instead of people.  The application of fertilizer, pesticides, and herbicides is a lot more accurate now.  Now the flaggers aren't exposed to the chemicals and due to technology, all is right with the world.  Or is it?

While eating my lunch today in my office which consisted of some delicious warmed up home-cooked leftovers of peas over rice, with fresh green beans and new potatoes and squash fritters, I was reading This Article in the Washington Post online.  The author's assertions dovetail nicely with my ruminations while I was brushing my teeth this morning, listening to the sounds of the Ag Cat's engine.

In what will surprise no one, the USDA says that "Today's farms are fewer and bigger."  In the article, the author, Mr. Ferdman states:
Peak farm, as it happens, happened almost 80 years ago in the United States. The number of farms in the country has fallen by some 4 million between then and now — from more than 6 million in 1935 to roughly 2 million in 2012. Meanwhile, the average farm size has more than doubled, and the amount of total land being farmed has, more or less, remained the same. 
The author goes on to say that the top 10% of farms make up more than 70% of the cropland in the US and that the top 2.2% takes up more than a third!  The two charts below bear those numbers out:

Image Credit
Most farms are still relatively small, although big farms are getting bigger.  Funny thing is, we're seeing a rise on both ends of the spectrum, with growing large and small farms and shrinking mid-sized farms.  The information within the box below is very interesting:
The mean farm size is 234 acres.  Half of all farms have 45 acres or less and half of all acres are on farms with less than 1,100 acres.
Image Credit
Now I am not a skilled researcher and my opinions are merely that - an opinion, but upon looking at the trends in both the line and bar chart below, I immediately had two theories:

#1 The first chart shows a precipitous fall in the number of farms and a corresponding increase in the size of farms around 1940.  What significant happened around that time? That's when tractors really began to replace horses, oxen and mules on the farm in a big way.  I'm going to research that to confirm my hypothesis, though.  When you have large, powered equipment not only can you work more land, but you must work more land in order to pay the notes on it.

Image Credit
#2 The second chart shows huge growth on both the small and large ends of the chart.  In order to justify purchasing a combine costing several hundred thousands of dollars, you MUST get bigger. Conversely, there are a large number of people that are nostalgic about a simpler life and have purchased small farms to grow their own food, re-connect with the land, homestead, or operate small farms serving the local community with wholesome food.

Image Credit
As I finished reading Mr. Ferdman's article, there were 4 comments, one of them being this:

justaguy22
9/17/2014 6:09 AM CDT
Notice when the shift in farm size began? In the early to mid 1900's. That is also around the time that farmers began using more tractors and powered equipment. Prior to that, the economies of scale for using horse drawn equipment were limited. But with the rise of the tractor and powered equipment, it made more economic sense for a farm to become larger in order to spread the equipment costs over more land as well as the equipment allowing one person to farm more acreage. 

We are seeing more smaller farms for both hobby reasons and for specialty crop production such as herbs or intensively farmed local vegetables. These small farms are very labor intensive but do not require expensive equipment.

I guess me and justaguy22 have reached consensus on it and it is now settled!  Ha Ha!

So back to my initial thoughts of the crop duster, perhaps the now-unemployed flagger made obsolete by GPS technology becoming available to agriculture was not replaced after-all.  Maybe he just stopped trying to get bigger and shifted his involvement in agriculture to a smaller, slower, more enjoyable scale.  "You can take the boy out of the country, but you can't take the country out of the boy."

Perhaps many of the old flaggers are "waving the white flag" at the modern industrial farming model that requires you to be heavily leveraged, leaving you stressed about the increasing debt-load, experiencing rising costs of production while seeing low commodity prices that result in a very low return on investment. Maybe they are instead opting to become small farmers.

Maybe the small farmer isn't nearing extinction after-all!

No comments:

Post a Comment